Does coverage review serve up both relevant and non-relevant documents?

The assertion that coverage review does not serve up both relevant and non-relevant documents is based on the understanding of how coverage review functions in analytic processes. Coverage review is specifically designed to ensure that the set of documents reviewed includes all relevant materials pertinent to a particular inquiry or case.

In a well-structured coverage review, the focus is on identifying and serving only those documents that are relevant to the matter at hand. The objective is to streamline the review process and enhance efficiency by eliminating non-relevant documents from consideration. If a system or method serves up both relevant and non-relevant documents, it would undermine the purpose of a targeted coverage review, which is to maximize relevance and significance.

While it is true that different document sets or specific project requirements might lead to variations in how coverage is executed, the fundamental principle remains that coverage reviews prioritize relevant content, making the definitive answer that such a review does not typically include non-relevant documents.